Recently, Genomeweb ran two articles on patents and molecular diagnostics.
The first article, on November 15, covered discussions at the annual AMP meeting. Roger Klein MD JD, of Case Western, debated with Timothy Stenzel, COO of Invivoscribe.
In a second article, December 5, the rate of patent applications was assessed by Duke's Arti Rai and Santa Clara University's Colleen Chien. Rai and Chien studied 27,000 patent applications from 2002 to 2014. The data was presented at a Utah conference and is not yet published. (For an earlier Rai publication,
here.)
Patents provide a barrier to entry, which can encourage investment by allowing a window of protected time for investment recoupment. This could be more important in situations where there is a large upfront investment required, but a relatively low ongoing marginal cost, and, where the product could otherwise be easily observed and replicated.
We can draw a line between these articles and a
December 8 article, also in Genomeweb, that
Interpace Diagnostics (Parsippany, NJ) has obtained coverage for 200M patients, including major payers like Aetna and Medicare and some BCBS plans for its ThyraMir thyroid nodule classifier test. According to the article, " Molecular testing using ThyGenX and ThyraMir has been shown to reduce the rate of unnecessary surgeries in indeterminate cases." More after the break.