Confirmed speakers and panelists currently include: Speakers
- Alexander Savchenko, Head of Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology, Novartis
- Asaf Zviran, CEO & Co-Founder, PrismAI Therapeutics
- Israel Tojal Da Silva, Head of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, AC Camargo
- Timothy Taxter, Executive Medical Director, AI Applications, Tempus AI
- Tuvik Beker, CEO, Pangea Biomed
Panelists
- Ben Glass, SVP, Product, AI and Translational Research, PathAI
- Jim Godsey, Scientific Co-Chair, BLOODPAC (moderator)
- Karim Azer, Global Head of Data and AI, Novartis
- Matt Eaton, Head of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Precede Biosciences
- Orly Alter, CSO & Co-Founder, PrismAI Therapeutics
### AI CORNER ### I gave the agenda to CHAT GPT 5 and asked it to expand on what the workshop MIGHT cover, in more detail. Just for fun, here is what the AI guessed might occur.
###
AI TEXT FOLLOWSBLOODPAC “New Frontiers in Therapy Selection: Beyond DNA Mutations”
November 5, 2025 | 1–3 PM ET (Virtual)
This year’s BLOODPAC New Frontiers Seminar promises a focused deep dive into how multi-omic and multimodal data are changing therapy selection. The two-hour agenda brings together leaders from pharma, diagnostics, and AI to discuss the move beyond DNA mutations toward integrated decision frameworks that capture real-time tumor biology. Here’s what this likely means in practice — and what to watch for.
1. Thematic Scope: Beyond DNA = Multi-Omic Therapy Selection
BLOODPAC’s framing (“beyond DNA mutations”) signals a pivot from purely mutational calls toward functional, dynamic, and multimodal signals:
-
cfRNA & Exosomal RNA: Measuring pathway activity, fusions, and splice variants that directly inform therapy selection.
-
Methylation Signatures: Sensitive at low tumor fractions, enabling tissue-of-origin calls and immune profiling.
-
Fragmentomics: Nucleosome and size patterns that infer chromatin state, tumor proliferation, and immune activity.
-
Proteomics & Tumor-Educated Platelets: Circulating proteins and platelet RNA as early-response indicators.
-
Digital Pathology: Whole-slide imaging (WSI) features like immune cell proximity, necrosis, or TLS density that complement liquid biopsy.
-
Composite Scores: AI-driven integration of these modalities into a single predictive index.
2. Speaker and Panel Contributions: What They Likely Add
Knowing the confirmed faculty lets us anticipate specific use cases and challenges that will surface:
-
Alexander Savchenko (Novartis, Molecular Pathology): Case studies on embedding RNA, epigenetics, and digital pathology into drug development pipelines. Likely to discuss regulatory-grade assay design and cross-site harmonization.
-
Asaf Zviran & Orly Alter (PrismAI Therapeutics): Computational biology innovators who will highlight how machine learning on RNA + methylation + liquid biopsy predicts response or resistance, including approaches for algorithm validation.
-
Israel Tojal da Silva (AC Camargo): Insights from a major cancer center on applying multi-omics in clinical trial cohorts and navigating real-world logistics (sample handling, assay reproducibility).
-
Timothy Taxter (Tempus AI): Experience with large-scale multimodal data fusion — probably a case where combining WSI + RNA + DNA outperforms single-omic models for patient stratification.
-
Tuvik Beker (Pangea Biomed): Perspective on pathway-level “network activity scores” derived from RNA, and how they can predict sensitivity to targeted therapies even in the absence of canonical driver mutations.
On the panel, expect:
-
Ben Glass (PathAI): Deep dive on using AI-powered histology features as a co-equal “omic” alongside liquid biopsy.
-
Karim Azer (Novartis): Pharma view on data integration at scale and challenges for regulatory acceptance and clinical trial endpoints.
-
Matt Eaton (Precede Biosciences): Practical considerations for deploying multi-omic assays in diverse patient populations, including reference ranges and normalization.
3. Likely Discussion Tracks
a) Therapy Selection When DNA Isn’t Enough
Examples where mutation calls are inconclusive — e.g., tumors with no actionable mutation, ambiguous VAFs, or pathway redundancy — and how RNA/methylation rescue the signal.
b) Real-Time Tumor Dynamics
Moving beyond baseline biomarkers: serial blood draws to track therapy response, clonal evolution, immune activation. Look for debate about sampling cadence and “how much change is enough” to alter treatment.
c) Digital Pathology + Blood Concordance
Integrating tissue and plasma signals:
-
Resolving false negatives in ctDNA by leveraging pathology-based tumor burden metrics.
-
Using WSI-derived immune contexture to decide if a patient is an I/O responder even when blood signals are borderline.
d) Analytics & AI
Managing heterogeneous, missing-by-design data:
-
Late vs. early data fusion.
-
Model drift and reproducibility in multi-omic pipelines.
-
Version control and regulatory reporting for AI-based algorithms.
e) Pre-Analytical Discipline
Blood tube chemistry, time-to-spin, RNA stabilization — critical for multi-omic reliability. Expect mention of BLOODPAC’s pre-analytical best practices playbooks and calls for community consensus on multi-omic QC metrics.
f) Regulatory & Reimbursement Pathways
-
Regulated unit question: Is the “test” the wet lab assay, the algorithm, or the combined system?
-
FDA change-control rules for composite tests — can you swap in a new RNA panel without a full re-clearance?
-
MolDx & CPT coding: Will multi-omic reports get one bundled code or modular coding (DNA + RNA + algorithm add-on)? This matters for pricing and adoption.
4. Clinical Utility & Trial Design
-
Designing trials that credit composite decision-making (RNA+DNA+IHC) rather than a single biomarker.
-
Using real-world data to justify coverage when randomized trials aren’t feasible.
-
Outcomes endpoints: replacing imaging scans with serial multi-omic MRD-style testing.
5. Consortium Deliverables
Expect BLOODPAC to preview:
-
Expanded multi-omic lexicon building on its ctDNA/MRD glossary.
-
Candidate reference materials for methylation and RNA assays.
-
Plans for shared datasets and benchmark challenges to accelerate algorithm validation.
6. Questions to Anticipate
-
“What is the clinical decision delta when adding RNA/methylation — beyond just higher AUC?”
-
“How do we validate a composite score when each component has different LoDs?”
-
“How do we manage regulatory submissions when AI models evolve?”
-
“How to price and code serial, multimodal tests for longitudinal care?”
Bottom Line
This seminar is poised to be less about abstract enthusiasm for multi-omics and more about how to make it work in practice — technically, operationally, and regulatorily. The lineup suggests robust case studies, frank discussions of assay standardization, and an emphasis on data fusion and deployment in real-world trials.
If you plan to attend, prepare to engage on clinical utility design, regulatory evidence frameworks, and practical multi-omic integration, as these will be front and center.
Would you like me to turn this into a one-page executive briefing or slide-ready deck (with key sections bolded and schematic diagrams for “multi-omic data fusion” and “clinical decision flow”)? That could make it easy to share with clients or colleagues ahead of the seminar.
[END AI TEXT] |